Wwi surplus gas mask11/8/2023 In a sense possible but not historically accurate. An M15 should not have a 1918 dated filter. So strictly speaking they are not interchangeable from an historical perspective. They use the same thread (an electric lamp bulb thread) but they actually made a number of different models of filter during the war. Are the filters interchangeable for the M1915 and M1917 masks. I cannot imagine a soldier choosing to keep a blister contaminate mask as a souvenir - remember that the contamination would have been much worse 100 years ago.ģ. I have handled a large number of WW1 masks and never had one with any smell of blister. Blister gases - these are nasty, they are typically a liquid at room temperature and pressure (RTP). Arsenic smokes, these are actually powders, not very toxic, there is a potential residual contamination inside the filter again do not breath through this. So long as you do not attempt to breath through them any asbestos fibre is not an issue.Ĭontamination with gas from WW1 - Really not an issue. Multiple points of difference, finish & feel It would be possible to "fake" these to appear original but if you get a bit of experience handling original examples it will be easy to distinguish these. Not so much faked but rather reproductions are manufactured for re-enactors. Wiki □Īnd because the M1915 was mentioned and because.well, why not? □ Here is a M1917 mask displayed in a museum, compliments of Dr. Spare lenses offered with the above mask. This is something normally missing with reproductions. From my research there is normally a rubber gasket between the filter and mask to create a better seal. The M1917's elastic bands were suppose to be a step up from the 15's springs.Ī photo of the lower part of the mask where the filter connects. Here is a mask offered at a recent auction. Is this correct or am I referencing the wrong sites?Īgain, any info you offer will be much appreciated □ □Īn wonderful and accurate reproduction offered by Hessen Antiques. The price I'm coming up with is $350-$500 USD. This is based on his existing collection of Russian and US post war crap. What is the median price one should pay for one if these things? Pete (whose about as dense as a cinder block) was hoping to pay about $100 USD. It would make sense but, being in the military myself, I know that just because something makes sense doesn't make it a reality.Ĥ. Are these things safe to have in the home/around children? I've heard that the filters can contain asbestos but also that the chemical residue from actually poison gas can remain.ģ. I know there are reproductions about there but it seems the reproductions can be convincing dolled up to look 100+ years old.Ģ. The M1915 had rubberized canvas and seems to be much rarer than the M1917 which was made from oil impregnated leather and for this reason the tend to age well.ġ. I know that there were two types of German masks during the Great War the M1915 and 17. Ok, a few minutes of typing, a little googling in exchange for a Chicago style deep dish? Sounds like a deal □)Īfter a few days on Google I feel pretty familiar with WW1 German gas masks. (Also, my friend, we'll call him Pete, is one lazy SOB and when I refered him to this forum he shrugged and said he'd buy me a pizza if I'd do the research for him. Gas masks really aren't my thing but I love to learn about anything military so here I am. Knowing that I'm a small time collector he's asked me for my advice. And according to him, it really doesn't get more iconic than the M1917. Most of what he has are modern army surplus items bought on the cheap but he's now looking on buying an "iconic" item. While I really don't plan to purchase one due to the asbestos in the filters a friend of mine is looking to add one to his collection. Hello everyone, I have a question about the M1917 German Gasschutzmaske Gas Mask.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |